The Gift of Gold Johnny Wu
Born on September 3,
1940, Kevin Starr is an American historian who is best-known for
his multi-volume series on the history of California.
He received his B.A. from the University
of San Francisco in 1962 and a
doctorate from Harvard University
in 1969 in American Literature, and he has served as California
State Librarian from 1994 to 2004.
Currently, Starr is a Professor of History at the University
of Southern California.
On the crisp morning of January 24,
1848, John Marshall, an employee at Sutter¡¦s Mill, discovered tiny specks of
metal as he was inspecting the channel surrounding the sawmill. Instinctively
believing that his discovery had some hidden value, Marshall
immediately presented it to the other mill workers and insisted on assaying its
origins. After performing a ¡§lye test and malleability¡¨ assessment, he and his
fellow carpenters concluded that the specks could be of no other metal than
gold, and they quickly spread news of their jackpot to nearby towns.1 Though
seemingly insignificant compared to the political turmoil at the time, this
first discovery of gold would later hallmark a decade of mass migration and
societal growth, prompting the rapid development of the newly founded state of
California. More importantly, however, was the international attention it
garnered, which led not only to the settlement of diverse groups of people but
also to the growing status of California
as a new global front. These changes, tracked in Kevin Starr and Richard Orsi¡¦s Rooted in Barbarous Soil, faced initial
trepidation and backlash but inevitably shaped modern-day California
as a diverse and cultured community.
Initially, the authors describe the
first waves of migration during the fledgling years of the Gold Rush. At first,
the arrival of news about the gold discoveries in the eastern half of America
had been greeted with much skepticism. However, the truth of the stories
mounted nevertheless, and the discoveries achieved universal acceptance when
President James K. Polk publicly confirmed the gold in California.
Soon after, almost every citizen was afflicted by wild, uninhibited enthusiasm,
and the news spread to every corner of the American continent. Immediately,
settlers left their families back East and began to pour into California,
spurred by a wide range of motives. For most, wealth was the primary factor.
However, the allure of treasure also offered young people escape from what they
thought of as the limited horizons of Eastern prospects, and it opened
seemingly infinite opportunities to the restless youth. By 1849, the news of
Californian gold had spread throughout the world; just as American citizens
were seduced by the enormous wealth obtainable through gold, so too were the
Europeans and Asians. As the Gold Rush continued in full force, immigrant
settlement skyrocketed, with some ethnic minorities gradually turning into
majorities; for instance, the Chinese numbered only 660 in 1850, but in only
two decades, they were 48,790 strong and ¡§the second largest foreign-born group
in California.¡¨2 Though initially a boon to California¡¦s
development, the immense settlement of the newly-acquired territory eventually
led to unprecedented competition and hostility, shattering many immigrants¡¦
dreams of prosperity and success.
Starr
and Orsi investigate the causes and effects of California
nativism, which appears in history almost
simultaneously as the initial migration. In the year following the discovery of
gold, the first group of immigrants to settle in California
was the Latin Americans, comprised of mainly Mexicans and also South Americans,
such as Chileans and Peruvians. These immigrants easily traveled to the Gold
Rush sites since they not only lived in close proximity to them, but they also
traded and regularly interacted with people already there. After
the Latin Americans came the Chinese, who had also traded with the United States at Hong Kong. But, because of their relatively late arrival in
approximately 1852, their story belongs to the latter period of the Gold Rush.
Even though they were valued for their ingenuity at first, the immigrants in California
eventually faced persecution as land and supplies dwindled and competition
surged. Ironically, many of the natives continued to use foreign innovations
well into the Gold Rush despite their continuous attacks on other ethnicities.
To counter the rising competition, American miners used two methods to drive
the foreigners out¡Xphysical intimidation and discriminatory rules and laws. At
first, these practices applied to all non-natives, but as more ethnic settlers
arrived in California, nearly all whites, including immigrants, cooperated
together to expel the migrants. However, one group of whites¡Xthe French¡Xwere
not accepted as honorary Americans due to their refusal to adopt Anglo-American
language and culture as well as their close affiliations with Latin American
miners. As a result, the French and Latin American settlers often worked with
each other to repel nativist policies and practices
and even formed joint commissions to oversee this process. Less well known
victims of racism were the gold seekers of African ancestry from places outside
the United States.
By the time gold was discovered in California,
blacks had been in the Americas
for more than three centuries. Yet, since they were so small in number, ¡§no
organized campaign developed to drive them out of the mines,¡¨ though they still
faced the pandemic racism from the rest of the country.3
Unlike African Americans, who could speak English and were familiar with American
laws, the Chinese who came later during the Gold Rush had no prior experience
as oppressed minorities. To exploit their lack of cultural knowledge, native
miners and politicians levied complicated taxes and fees to economically force
them out, and when they felt that too many Chinese were settling in gold sites,
they passed laws that prevented any of them from working in mines. Yet, the
Chinese managed to earn a living outside of the mines as cooks, wood gatherers,
laundrymen, or farmers, and soon after their expulsion from the mines, they
hired white attorneys to combat the unlawful policies set by the natives.4 Despite these measures, they faced the
same violence and hostility as the rest of the foreigners and endured racism in
both the workplace and their homes. Though rejected by native settlers due to
competition and greed, ethnic immigrants still managed to leave a cultural
imprint on the fledgling state of California.
When
the migrants moved to California
in the 1850s, they brought not only their diverse cultures and heritages but
also differing treatments of women. Since the majority of settlers during the
Gold Rush were young men, women soon became as prized as gold for their
domestic as well as sexual services. The few women residing in northern California
performed ordinary household chores, such as cleaning and cooking, that would
be insignificant in any other circumstance; however, the men who mined for gold
desperately needed these services and often paid any price to obtain them. As a
result, women often earned equal or greater respect as their male counterparts
did; unsurprisingly, this respect was reserved only for white women, as women
from external cultures faced the same racism as their men did. When the Chinese
brought their women to California,
whites procured them not for business and domestic services, but for
prostitution. Long-standing Chinese cultural tradition regarded daughters from
an economic perspective, and the Gold Rush thrived on economics; thus, many
indentured their ¡§daughters as prostitutes¡¨ to financially survive in the
competitive world of gold mining.5 Other
women found themselves in expanding domestic roles and held an equal share of
the religious and cultural responsibilities held by men. For instance, in Jewish
communities, women shared ¡§the common problem of providing future generations¡¨
with religious and practical education and were often sent for marriage to
Californian men.6 Due to the scarcity of
women in the gold fields, they became highly valuable as caretakers and
educators, allowing them to find prosperity in subtle yet significant ways.
The
arrival of numerous groups of immigrants, despite being condemned by nativists, ultimately shapes the very nature of religion
and pop culture in Gold Rush California.
With the ¡§rush of new settlers¡¨ and gold miners, Native American and Hispanic
Catholic religious worlds were either pushed aside or forced out of existence,
though the latter did live on in some places.7
These religions, despite their former dominance in the West, were overwhelmed
by the Jewish and Chinese religious communities that had mobilized to stake out
a piece of California for themselves. As a result, foreign religions, such as
Judaism and Buddhism, soon swept throughout northern California
and permeated through its largest cities, thereby carving out new niches for
the immigrants to settle in.
Though
Rooted in Barbarous Soil depicts numerous and diverse aspects of the
Gold Rush, the topics discussed actually share a common bond of internationalism,
brought to California by the
myriad of immigrants and their respective cultures. According to Starr, the
mass migration initiated by the Gold Rush eventually ushered in a new age of
internationalism and ¡§exposed the entire country to global affairs for the
first time.¡¨ 8The different subjects in
the book, such as religion and race, may be found in all of America during the
1850s, but only in California do they embody an entirely new meaning¡Xa meaning
of assimilation as well as cooperation, of hostility along with acceptance. If
religion was confined to Christian Protestantism in the eastern United
States, in California,
it would consist of no fewer than twenty faiths, all arrivals from foreign
lands. If the only races in the East were two grayscale colors, in California,
people from every section of a color wheel would be seen. By drawing together
people from all four corners of the world, the Gold Rush brought not just their
cultures to the West Coast, but ¡§renewed imperatives of life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness.¡¨ 9
Instead
of downplaying the rampant nativism in Gold Rush California,
Starr and Orsi explore it in depth to reveal the
racist catalysts that sparked the dawn of internationalism in America.
Since California was the ¡§first U.S. territory to experience a wave of global
immigrants,¡¨ it unsurprisingly housed the most diverse cultures in the nation,
with some of which that had clashed violently and others that had negotiated peacefully.10As such, it was the first
international experiment in the U.S., and even though it produced some negative
repercussions, overall, it transformed not only California but also all of
America into the global fronts that they are today.
In
writing their book, Starr and Orsi take a liberal
point of view and attempt to reveal hidden aspects of the Gold Rush era. Though
they depict both the positive and negative qualities of the era, they almost
focus exclusively on the consequences rather than the causes of certain events.
For instance, while they dedicate several chapters just to race relations
during the Gold Rush, they barely include any information on how or why these
different ethnicities battled each other. Yet, at the same time, this point of
view lends to their purpose, which is to shed light on the ¡§nation-transforming
results¡¨ of the Gold Rush, not their petty causes.11
From the inclusion of a wide range of topics to the holistic interpretation of
the California 1850s, the book clearly upholds a New Left historiography and
leaves almost no detail behind.
Despite
its minor flaws, the book is still well respected among the academic community.
According to David Farrell, a writer for the Canadian Journal for History,
the integration of both the initial racial tension and the ultimate cultural
benefits of the Gold Rush render the era as ¡§a success story¡¨¡Xone that includes
the undesirable as well as the desirable in its telling.12
By revealing the cruel nativist policies of the white
miners, the authors write about topics that were previously unknown to the
general public and they redefine the Gold Rush as not an era of prosperity, but
one of disenfranchisement and crime.
Despite this, Martin Meeker, a
visiting lecturer from University of California,
Berkeley, believes the writers do
not focus exclusively on the negative aspects of the time period but instead,
bring in a wealth of positive outcomes of the seemingly bleak events. In
fact, the inclusion of both initial chaos and subsequent order strengthens the
latter ¡§by providing a point of reference¡¨ for the juxtaposition of the two.13
In
addition to its optimistic tone and attention to detail, the book offers
meticulously researched information about relatively unknown topics. For
example, though the subject of the third chapter is nativism,
it also describes in detail the ¡§unfortunate Chinese women who were forced into
prostitution.¡¨14 In addition,
almost every chapter begins with an anecdote that propels the focus from the
individual to society, and illustrations accompanied by relevant text appear on
almost every page, effectively transitioning from one subject to another.
Though they deal with scholarly topics and data, these chapters are written
such that even laypeople could understand their meaning; this relatively simple
style, by excluding esoteric terms and phrases, allows for effortless reading
and comprehension.
By
1850, California had just been
admitted to the Union as a non-slave state and was
beginning its first years in national turmoil. During this era, fierce debate
over state rights and the issue of slavery spread throughout the entire East
coast, and as the conflicts waged on, they would eventually incite the
separation of the country. At the start of the decade, the Compromise of 1850
had been passed to address the controversies arising from the Mexican American
War. While it had quelled some dissent between the slave states in the South
and the free states to the North, the compromise was quickly rendered
ineffective four years later, when the Kansas-Nebraska Act passed. By advocating
popular sovereignty in the disputed territories of Kansas
and Nebraska, the act nullified
the Missouri Compromise and fiercely divided the North and South. These
repercussions, though omnipresent in almost every state along the Atlantic,
did not develop in California
until years later since ¡§few people had settled there directly from the East at
that time.¡¨15 As more ethnic
groups arrived, the issue of racism in the Golden
State gradually diverged from the
same issue in the East because of the rising competition from the foreigners.
As a result, racist practices struck anyone, including those of white descent,
who competed against the Yankee majority and consisted more of political
trickery than violent backlash. Though the conflicts over state rights and slavery
seized the rest of the country, they virtually had no impact in California,
where citizens were more concerned for their own survival than political
issues.
On
a more positive note, California,
due to the diverse migrant groups it attracted, became the first state in the U.S.
to experience the full spectrum of global cultures that is present today. Its
experiences as a multicultural experiment formed the foundations of future
racial relations and led the nation to adopt a more international approach to
foreign policy. Aside from the political benefits produced by California,
the state¡¦s Gold Rush ushered in mass migrations and cheap labor, thereby
creating not only important ports and cities on the West coast but also
transcontinental railways that ¡§bridged the East to the West.¡¨16
Also, the sheer amount of settlers to the area expanded the national economy
and brought new trade to the rest of the country. Finally, the state of California
embodied opportunity and prosperity in the eyes of the youth back East, and its
allure gave renewed hope to those in pursuit of the American Dream. As the
final frontier in America,
California became both a
philosophical and practical inspiration for the rest of the country.
From
the earliest beginnings of the Gold Rush, California
experienced cultures from not just different areas of the American continent,
but that of the entire world. It endured both vicious racism and cultural
acceptance years later, and it became the first state of its kind to possess an
immensely diverse population from all areas of the globe. As such, it also
became the ¡§forefront of internationalism,¡¨ with entire cities consisting of
ethnic majorities; in this manner, the Gold Rush did to California
what fire had done to man¡Xit sparked the immediate development of not only
diverse groups of people and their cultures but also the future success of the
state, embodied in both philosophy and practice.17
1. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi. Rooted in Barbarous Soil: People, Culture, and Community in Gold
Rush California. London: University
of California Press, 2000, 7
2. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
15-16
3. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
35
4. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
62
5. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
87
6. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
134
7. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
194-95
8. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
10-11
9. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
9
10. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
16
11. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
39
12. Farrell, David. "Rooted in Barbarous Soil: People, Culture, and Community in
Gold Rush California." Canadian Journal of History 2002 1 Jun 2008
<http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3686/is_200212/ai_n9148264/pg_1>,
1
13. Meeker, Martin. "An ecumenical challenge of unprecedented magnitude."
H-Net 2 Jun 2008 <http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=6144985882533>,
1
14. Starr,
Kevin, and Richard Orsi, 57
15. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
17-18
16. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
79
17. Starr, Kevin, and Richard Orsi,
92